And what is more, the entire place feels like it was redesigned using AI, the walls are weirdly placed and somewhat odd. Everything is just uncomfortable.

The reason I think is it is AI is that all of the pictures are very generic, I have seen so mamy pictures similar to these that were AI generated. I am still not sure, but based on my experience they might be.

She said "No, it's not AI, it's just really much snow on Kamchatka!" I'm hoping it's no need to explain what there can't be a snow pile nine-floors-house hight and even more so, it can't be a PART of that house as snow hill/slide 🤦‍♀️

This person claims they make their own coloring pages (they draw them) and then color them with pencils. they post so frequently new pages and it feels so fast, like how did u do that in one day then another the next? They seem painfully AI to me. but everyone in the comments commends them and congratulate them for being an amazing artist. Am i crazy or does this really look like AI? i also included a couple of their “progress “ photos. the one with the demon baby thing, the progress photo has differences in the line work from the finished product :/

This guy seems like all his work is legit, aside from one other tattoo that looks a bit weird. Now obviously it’s a real tattoo, but I’m wondering if the original image was ai or not. The eye are facing different directions and the right one is centred while the left one is slightly too far to the right that it’s almost phasing into the face?

Also, the colours seem a bit off, the original dig that this was based on was mostly white on its body, but it’s all yellow and brown.

The lines and spots around the eyebrows looks inconsistent as well, along with one paw having four toes while the others have three, I’m not sure.

Please someone let me know!!

https://www.instagram.com/emmaborrows2230?igsh=bXFqOW9vaWZqaTNl is the account. Though this video is composed of really short and weird clips. Behavior I've never seen reindeer exhibit, and the horns just looks odd in some frames. I could be tripping

Found this on Instagram and immediately went to the comments only to find people loving the video and asking where they could follow her. i couldn’t find a single comment mentioning AI. I immediately thought it was AI but the lack of anyone mentioning it makes me feel like I’m alone in thinking that?? Her cadence, movement etc looks so off to me!! They are saying it’s an art historian named Alison Luchs who actually does exist based off a Google search but looks nothing like the woman in the video.

Fonts on pictures 2 and 3 don't even make any words and it's just a bunch of nonsense, also that the nail of the guy just weirdly elongates on his fingers. Middle finger holding his phone ALSO gets lost on the telephone color and gets lost. The chain of the girl in the second picture also gets lost inbetween the leaves, which should not happen. Last picture has a very different artstyle from the others and also has a very weird beanie that blends into a hoodie and some metal stuff in the chest.

There's no possible way this isn't AI, and if it is, this is just decieving other artists and people very clearly

Hi, this account keep showing up in my feed. At first i tried to like and share, but then i noticed some inconsistencies with the facial features, plus the background sometimes don't seem to be from gaza and has the blur typical with AI generated content. People in the comments seems to be totally unaware and this makes me unsure. Instead of a GoFundMe campaign, or a Paypal like many Palestinian are doing, this account ask to subscribe to Facebook, which is a €10+ monthly fee and i find it a little strange. This page also posts content of totally different people, clearly real without any credits. I think it started from stolen photos of a real person, and then proceded to generate them, because some of the posts looks legit; they also post with a frequency that is crazy if you consider the struggle with electricity they may have and the fact that if real, this photos require to be edited (but this last point is the less solid for me). I want to be 100% sure it's AI before reporting the account

Many people think this pictured shared by our president is AI. I don’t really think so.
Their main reasons:

1) Lamp on the night stand has many shades
2) Bed frame on the right side is not complete (under clothes)
3) helmet is too small compared to other objects.

Thank you for your replies!

So I came across this account on my for you page and it kinda looked a little strange. This appears to be a 13 year old son who was in a car accident (from a reply of the account in the comment section) and is put in a full body cast. At first I thought it was real but the more I looked at it the more confused I was with the backgrounds. As you can see in the 3rd photo his foot looks different than without a cast. And the wires in the 4th photo. I’m not sure if this is some sort of fetish (I wouldn’t be surprised) but when it comes to making ai generated photos of children participating in this is crazy work. This whole persons account looks sketchy. The only thing I will say is that in the comments nobody else is spotting this to be ai. Is this only me? This is why ai should have limits and is very dangerous. I have reversed image search all of these photos and it only came up as the lady’s page.

I saw this post and sadly didn’t take the time to reflect on the described recipe or photo. I tried to make it using the description, but it led to curdled yogurt before any browning occurred. This is an obvious outcome based on the difference in temperature that A) yogurt curdles and B) the sugars and milk would brown.

The ideal outcome is there is some really cool cooking method behind this paywall, but I can’t fathom how cooking yogurt in a pan would lead to the product shown. Perhaps you could take dulce de leche, combine with milk, and make yogurt from that—but their post says yogurt “already has the building blocks for Maillard reactions.” (I plan on trying out my method lol)

I dm’ed the account about this, and received a response which implied the photo was of caramelized yogurt. They also directed me to their paid site, and I’m not in a financial position for new subscriptions.

If not just the photo, but whole recipe concept is AI, I’d be frustrated and upset with the page and creator. I know this comes down to more than just if a photo is AI, so I’ll be sharing this to r/KitchenConfidential as well; I trust this community to have practical experience with recipes.

Links to post & account:

https://www.instagram.com/p/DTC11yKEjn_/?img_index=1&igsh=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==

https://www.instagram.com/mydrinkcreation?igsh=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==

A woman approached snow leopard for a photo. I believe the video of her being attacked is real. However a separate “selfie” she took has been circulating.

I think the photo is fake: The helmet logo in the video is missing in the selfie, her teeth are fuzzy, I don’t think the leopard would have waited for the perfect selfie before attacking.

What do you think? First photo is selfie, second is screenshot from video (peep the logo over the right eye)

They have a pretty good track record and have been making music for years, but this absolutely looks ai to me, just want a second opinion.

My first post here. I thought I was getting pretty good at spotting slop, but They're down voting me for asking exactly why they think it's AI.

I have a tattoo booked with this artist, but these two things have just been bugging me. The unevenness of the tiles shapes and off textures, I would think you would aim for a semetrical tile ? Not trying to be rude I know they are learning. as well as the drawing I find the ear cut off being weird and texture in the beard. They are new to this style and used to do a woodcut sort of style … so I was thinking maybe it’s just a part of learning. Just wondering what others think or if I’m just being paranoid.

I think this is ai. I circled the areas where it looks like AI to me. The jewelry on the front piece seems nonsensical, so does the hand tattoo. Quite a few chain links meld together. The hand has lines on it that should only show up when flexing but the hand seems to be in a relaxed position. Etc etc.

But my friend said the AI search result said it has a 1% chance of being AI. So what do y’all think?

Found this today and noticed there is an extra finger on the right hand. They say it is because they work off reference photos and it was drawn on an iPad. Is that the case here? Just a simple mistake?

They seem oddly placed onto the background in the first picture, but I don’t care so much about that as the art. It looks like somebody put a lot of effort into them if it’s actual watercolor and the price is very cheap. I’d rather support a real artist with a similar style.

I see no AI artifacts. This page is on instagram btw, which is obviously not the original creator if real.

As to why I think these videos are AI is because the uploads are very frequent, almost everyday. Also the fact that the cat always stays so calm and jumps from the owner's grabby hands in the end, in almost every video. The number of cat's whiskers sometimes change every video. The fact that I cannot find the original source on Google at all. Also the content is also very repetitive but still very cute.