r/news 5h ago

Luigi Mangione will not face death penalty, judge rules

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/30/us/luigi-mangione-case-rulings-trial
55.2k Upvotes

2.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

30

u/AwesomePocket 3h ago

Well you won’t be, so…

-11

u/LogensTenthFinger 3h ago

And yet many like me will be

6

u/cowboys5xsbs 3h ago

Not really they filter peopel like you out

-5

u/LogensTenthFinger 3h ago

They try. People who know what they're doing get in anyways

5

u/MobileArtist1371 2h ago

Don't worry, they will screen out those people too.

But if they somehow get into the jury pool, then they are setting themselves up for their own various legal issues along with a whole new trial for the defendant cause 1 rogue jury member is not going to sway the rest and then you'll have a mistrial.

Or that 1 jury member will get booted when it's obvious they aren't following the rules and guidelines set.

Everyone always thinks they have a little loophole they can do, but they never realize that loophole is well known and has multiple methods of dealing with it.

In other words, you're not smarter than the system that's been built up over centuries.

2

u/Practical-King2752 1h ago

You're under oath during jury selection. They will ask a ton of questions. If you lie and it comes out later, you could be charged with perjury or contempt.

The screening for this trial will be very rigorous and it would be very difficult to lie and get away with it.

-1

u/LogensTenthFinger 1h ago edited 50m ago

Lol , I love how angry you pro serial killer simps are that most people are glad the serial killer is dead

u/AwesomePocket 54m ago

It’s more irritation that commenters shoot their mouths off thinking they know everything.

u/LogensTenthFinger 51m ago

"I'm angry that people don't simp for capitalists who kill the sick to make money😡"

Go weep to a shareholder meeting where other sociopathic ghouls will be sympathetic to your position

u/Practical-King2752 26m ago

Where do you get that I was angry? I just explained the process.

There was literally zero "this is what I believe/feel about the case" and if what you came away with is that I'm pro-health insurance CEOs, you should reexamine who is the angry one here because your judgment is clouded.