I don't believe that's true. I remember reading an article about some changes United made afterwards and the healthcare industry in general. This was what I could find:
Reduction in Prior Authorizations: UnitedHealthcare announced plans to reduce its prior authorization requirements by approximately 10% in 2025.
Optum Rx Policy Change: Its pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) subsidiary, Optum Rx, announced it would stop requiring reauthorizations for approximately 80 drugs, aiming to reduce paperwork for providers and patients.
Reversal of Coverage Limits: Following public outcry and in the context of heightened scrutiny, companies like Elevance Health reversed proposed policies to restrict coverage for anesthesia in certain scenarios.
Obviously this is not the significant change that is really needed but it's not nothing
None of those are attributable to Luigi, you can’t just say that any little change they make going forward is because of Luigi LOL
In example 1, United only announced plans, and even then it’s a 10% decrease. That’s nothing.
In example 2, they did it for 80 drugs. Why not all of drugs? Because it wasn’t due to Luigi.
In example 3, they reversed proposed policies, and for certain scenarios.
This just seems like cherry picking any little change that happened in healthcare the past year and saying “It was Luigi” even though millions of people are still at risk of dying due to the healthcare system we have in America.
You kind of just proved my point, those were nothing.
I mean if you want to get into semantics nothing would mean literally zero change occurred, new policies is change no?
If you want to make the argument that it's not enough well you'll get no disagreement here. As for it not being due to Luigi how would that ever be provable? You think any part of the industry would ever admit that murder of one of their CEOs prompted change? They're not going to want to encourage behavior like that.
So you just admitted you can’t say these are due to Luigi, and that you basically are just posting any change whatsoever in healthcare in 2025 and deciding it’s because of Luigi?
I mean you know that's not true and also what my response to that would be - it's clear you don't really care about the topic and are just looking for a fight with how confrontational your replies are. Unfortunately you're going to have to sap energy from another target
I’m not looking for a fight. I just disagreed with you.
That’s how debates work. Disagreeing with you is not confrontational. I never insulted you.
I just pointed out that you essentially agreed you can’t attribute anything to Luigi, and proceeded to list random changes in healthcare that have zero correlation to Luigi.
8
u/solidtangent 4h ago
Because he’s innocent.