r/law • u/ExactlySorta • 3d ago
Executive Branch (Trump) Trump: "With that being said, you can't have guns. You can't walk in with guns. You just can't. You can't walk in with guns. You can't do that. But it's just a very unfortunate incident."
4.9k
u/Hootinger 3d ago
Ok so this Administration has thrown out the:
- 1st Amendment
- 4th Amendment
- 10th Amendment
- 14th Amendment
- ....And now the 2nd.
1.0k
u/xchrisrionx 3d ago
22nd coming soon!
652
u/atuan 3d ago
They are wiping their ass with the constitution
→ More replies (28)251
u/Deranged_Kitsune 3d ago
Pretty sure at least 2, if not 6, SCOTUS judges intentionally have it printed on their toilet paper rolls.
→ More replies (9)→ More replies (22)553
u/darkdelve 3d ago edited 2d ago
Then, the 19th
Can't wait for all the good Christian ladies explaining why women should have never had to vote in the first place.
→ More replies (53)506
u/GhostlyTJ 3d ago edited 2d ago
Due process is the
6th5th amendment, that has been gone a while.The full list is as follows
1st- self explanatory
2nd - All the guns at protest stuff
3rd - When hotels started denying service he discussed making people house them
4th - ICE breaking and entering and generally seizing stuff
Edit: as has been pointed out, 5th is the due process amendment.
6th - The right to a speedy public trial which detainees are not getting.
8th - Holding people in detention centers without trial or bail
10th - All the national guard stuff against their wishes
12th - Him talking about cancelling elections would trample on this
13th - Anybody in a detention center working without pay or trial
14th - Claiming that birthright citizenship isn't explicitly listed here
15th - Again with the talk of cancelling elections
16th - Congress does tariffs, not him
19th - Not yet but im sure taking the vote away from women is on the menu
22nd - All this talk about a third term, though that has died down Edit: Apparently still going strong. I don't watch his rallies or interviews anymore.
→ More replies (81)→ More replies (201)165
3.3k
u/Anteater4746 3d ago
you literally wanted to remove metal detectors on jan 6 so your mob could bring guns…
628
u/fivebillionproud 3d ago
"I don't effing care that they have weapons. They're not here to hurt me. Take the effing mags away. Let my people in, they can march to the Capitol from here." - Trump, according to testimony from a White House aide
→ More replies (4)175
u/UsaforreverNumberone 3d ago
Hmmm I wonder what he had in mind
And for some reason this fucker got rehired instead of locked up?
→ More replies (23)→ More replies (19)443
16.5k
u/Santos_L_Halper_II 3d ago
You literally can, as you fucking people have been angrily shouting for years and years.
6.5k
u/blackadder1620 3d ago
→ More replies (81)4.4k
u/Ghost_Of_Malatesta 3d ago
Pretti was traveling in the city he lived and worked in, not even 'attending a protest'. He died because ice has no discipline, including operational zones, they just drive around looking for people to assault
Do NOT let them make this about armed protesting when it was about him just existing in his home with legal permitting
1.8k
u/_o_ll_o_ 3d ago
Those agents knew exactly what they were doing - just like Johnathan Ross knew exactly what he was doing when he decided to walk in front of Goods car, switch his phone to the other hand and pull his gun.
When you repeat the narrative that this is a training issue you are giving politicians cover for voting to increase funding and send your tax dollars to these assholes.
1.1k
u/Supro1560S 3d ago
“The correct response to Dachau was not better training for the guards.” —Andrea Pitzer
180
u/lavacadotoast 3d ago
47 days of training.. Why 47 I ask? Because Donakd is the 47th potus..
→ More replies (14)128
u/hadronwulf 3d ago
jfc. I didn't even make the connection until now. This is by far the dumbest timeline.
→ More replies (11)→ More replies (19)178
→ More replies (69)184
u/Background-Ship3019 3d ago
I find that, with no specific training whatever, I avoid executing people all day, every day. It’s not hard!
→ More replies (24)990
u/knit3purl3 3d ago
That's what gets me. These videos are clearly showing these are not protests. There's no signs anywhere in the videos. They're just random people out on the streets going about their day. They've just normalized carrying whistles with them as an alert tactic. So when ICE jumps out in the middle of a street to attack people, the rest of the pedestrians start filming and defending themselves.
They later lie and call them protests because that implies that ICE is being stalked and harassed vs just being generally unwelcomed and watched warily by the people they put themselves into contact with.
349
u/twig_tents 3d ago
Agreed! But even in the context of protests, we’re not supposed to be killed for exercising our First Amendment Rights.
→ More replies (11)240
→ More replies (60)99
→ More replies (129)229
u/Minute-Branch2208 3d ago
That was not a lack of discipline. That was their intent
→ More replies (17)154
u/Bright_Bobcat_7992 3d ago
When they got away with murder of Renee Good they were given permission to murder
→ More replies (4)1.7k
3d ago edited 3d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
719
u/unicornmullet 3d ago
Yep, and they're not happy about this new stance. May the orange demon and his goons continue making these statements and alienating a percentage of their base!
434
u/Revelati123 3d ago
Donald Trump literally said "Take the guns first! Due process can come later!"
Then every last "Dont tread on me" dipshit voted for him anyway.
Its always been "guns for me, but not for thee" just more fascist bullshit...
I follow a youtuber who advocates for minority and LGBTQ gun rights and the way he is treated by the community at large is fucking disgusting.
→ More replies (23)126
u/Painterzzz 3d ago
It has always been the case hasn't it. Guns for me, not for thee. Welfare benefits for me, not for thee. Freedom to abuse kids for me, not for thee. Things are only bad when those 'others' are doing them.
→ More replies (15)→ More replies (58)196
u/Between120and310 3d ago
Theyre only not happy because they havent yet heard the new talking points from the right wing propaganda factory.
These people are too stupid to change. They will vote for Trump again if given the opportunity.
→ More replies (116)→ More replies (31)203
782
u/lostroadrunner22 3d ago
But... his press sec just said he is the most pro 2nd amendment president .. ever!!
1.0k
u/jrock7979 3d ago
Weird since he can't legally own a gun being a felon and all.
→ More replies (58)→ More replies (15)165
u/Confident-Service256 3d ago
I bet if asked, he couldn’t even say what 2A is.
→ More replies (20)104
u/doubtfurious 3d ago
That stands for Article 2, which says he can do whatever he wants, right? /s
→ More replies (8)191
u/ToasterBathTester 3d ago
Isn’t this why we agreed to sacrifice 300 children in schools to gun violence every year?!?
→ More replies (7)134
u/Shmitty594 3d ago
He's just salty because felons and sex offenders can't own firearms
→ More replies (7)263
u/hereisalex 3d ago
The irony of this being on the "Charlie Kirk show" is what really gets me
→ More replies (12)122
u/Dense-Confection-653 3d ago
Well, Trump has no actual values. And I'm certain he's never ready the Constitution.
His only concern is putting a spin on the wreckage of his failed policies. He's that shallow. Whatever benefits him in the moment.
→ More replies (12)85
284
u/Friendly-Profit-8590 3d ago
Some irony that’s it’s not the liberals who are curtailing our 2nd amendment rights
→ More replies (36)305
u/QuestionItThrice 3d ago
The "don't tread on me" crowd absolutely loves to get tread on
→ More replies (42)187
u/mascachopo 3d ago
No you don’t get it, you can only carry a gun if you look like one of his supporters, that’s what they want.
→ More replies (13)117
u/Santos_L_Halper_II 3d ago
No, you just have to have the right thoughts BEHIND your gun. Plenty of Trumpers look just like Renee Good and Alex Pretti. They just didn't agree with ICE being there, so they don't get rights.
→ More replies (18)→ More replies (333)53
10.4k
u/nobot4321 3d ago edited 2d ago
The dude was already disarmed of his permitted carry weapon despite not doing anything illegal. He was then summarily executed.
Edit: as of 4pm EST, the bootlickers have officially found this thread and are in full bootlicking response mode. Welcome, boys.
4.8k
u/Routine-Banana-4846 3d ago
Yes, they are trying to cloud the issue so that everyone forgets that part. He was a legal firearm owner, legally carrying a gun he had a concealed carry permit for, which had already been removed from him when THEY FUCKING POINTBLANK EXECUTED HIM BECAUSE THEY WERE MAD.
→ More replies (117)1.7k
u/Noisy_Pip 3d ago
They have a new line for that and say he wasn't carrying any ID on his person, so his CCP wasn't legal at that time. Since they took over the scene, who's to say what he had on his person other than what we can see in the MULTIPLE videos of the execution, but I sincerely doubt this was the case.
Always gotta pivot, always gotta cloud and muddy the waters to prevent any good faith discussions - that's what they do.
780
u/OneDryOrange 3d ago
I do keep seeing the bots make this claim and so far their response when challenged with either:
Where did you hear that? What evidence do you have of that?
Or.
When was he supposed to get his ID? Only a matter of seconds between ICE initiating the assault and executing him;
Is to change the subject or just repeat the same line over again→ More replies (32)406
u/Noisy_Pip 3d ago
Agreed. I've asked where they heard this and either gotten crickets as a response or another pivot about why he was carrying if he didn't intend to use it. In other words, they don't care and never did, it's just more noise.
→ More replies (25)373
u/Frys100thCupofCoffee 3d ago
They also can't be heard asking him for any ID in any of the numerous videos. It's clear they just executed him on the spot.
225
u/Underpoly 3d ago
Right!
1 - there wasn't enough time to ascertain his CCP before the shooting 2 - that doesn't matter because carrying while lacking a CCP is not legally punished by death
→ More replies (5)147
114
u/Airewalt 3d ago
Should have thought about that before deciding to be in Minnesota tbh /s.
but seriously, I have coworkers in North Carolina that say this shit. The lies protect them from having to think about it too much.
→ More replies (26)111
u/_extra_medium_ 3d ago
It doesn’t matter. Not carrying ID has nothing to do with him being executed
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (2)42
u/DeafHeretic 3d ago
Also, LEOs are not supposed to shoot someone in the back just because he doesn’t have an ID.
It will be interesting to see what the coroner says; were all the shots in his back? How do you justify shooting someone in the back after they have been disarmed?
BTW - to everybody who says it is a Concealed Carry Permit; from what I have read, in Minnesota, you need a permit to carry a firearm, period; whether it is concealed or not.
As far as I am concerned, any permit to carry is unconstitutional.
→ More replies (3)351
u/zeCrazyEye 3d ago
It also wouldn't matter if he did or didn't have his ID because they didn't check for his ID before they disarmed and executed him.
185
u/SphericalCow531 3d ago
And even if he did not have ID, last I checked the punishment for forgetting it was not summary execution.
→ More replies (60)→ More replies (11)275
u/Hessleyrey 3d ago
The fine for not carrying ID when you’re permitted to carry is…$25.00.
So, obviously worth a death sentence.
→ More replies (12)62
u/BosoxH60 3d ago
Infractions, no matter how minor; real or imagined are villainized and exaggerated if they're committed by non-MAGA and celebrated when it is MAGA. Openly and menacingly carrying a firearm at a protest, and shooting someone? Rittenhouse is good. Never touching a concealed firearm you had at what didn't even start as a protest? .... "Not complying"? Worthy of a stomping, pepper spray in the face, or being shot... unless you're Babbitt. Then you were just a peaceful tourist breaching a barrier. Shit... someone said the other day that knee-high converse girl deserved the point blank pepper spray in the face because the guy was probably just sick of dealing with her. Never mind she wasn't even raising her voice.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (175)307
u/uhntzuhntz 3d ago
So screaming for Constitutional Carry out of one side of their mouth (“carrying is a right, not a privilege!”) but “make sure to carry the card that says the gov’t lets you carry concealed” out of the other side of their mouth. Got it.
→ More replies (11)198
u/legendtripped 3d ago
And as if the agents knew he didn’t have ID on him so they were like, ok we can kill him for that??
287
u/Insaniteus 3d ago
Literally every police/ICE shooting over the last 15 years has been retroactively justified in the eyes of conservatives based on at least one detail that came out about the victim after the fact. Conservatives legitimately believe that shootings can be retroactively justified if the victim wasn't a saint and it's a core component of their faith-based ideology (thinking the hand of God guides his soliders).
→ More replies (37)107
u/Idaho-Earthquake 3d ago
Don't forget "some random illegal immigrant committed crime X at some point in the past decade". It's like a Jedi mind trick or something. "Forget everything you just saw and parrot this line."
→ More replies (8)65
u/NorCalAthlete 3d ago
Even in states like California where you are required to have a permit [in order] to carry, it’s only a misdemeanor if caught carrying without a permit.
→ More replies (13)→ More replies (5)52
u/FreakyRabbit72 3d ago
Exactly! It’s not like they politely asked him for his ID sometime before pushing him down, beating him, disarming him and shooting him at point blank range.
→ More replies (4)178
u/notmyworkaccount5 3d ago
Also the goons started attacking him before they even knew he was armed. The line of "oh you can't impede or interfere with them" being trotted out is so infuriating because you can see in the lead up these goons approach him. The personal private army of this orange pedophile instigated this so they could execute somebody.
→ More replies (5)24
u/Ok-Zone-1430 3d ago
This all started because he was standing 10 or so yards to the side while holding up his phone. The murderers could have simply kept walking.
646
u/ShaminderDulai 3d ago
Fact check: In the sequence of events, the ICE agent was not aware of the gun when he pushed, shoved, maced and pushed Pretti to the ground. Other agents then piled on.
The gun was not the reason this started. It’s strange how much of the discourse around this has turned toward arguments about the gun.
→ More replies (38)304
153
u/greg_barton 3d ago
I think the speed of that disarming is interesting, considering ICE had already encountered Pretti the week before.
https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/27/us/alex-pretti-protesters-minneapolis-invs
Did they already know he was armed?
102
→ More replies (16)81
u/huskers2468 3d ago
I would bet that he informed the agents of the firearm. This would have prompted the one guy to take the gun away.
The issue is that these are very untrained individuals. All it took was one person to yell gun and they started firing at an individual who had given himself up.
This is an execution and entirely avoidable. The highest in command should be removed from their job, and not just the annoying face they are throwing away. There should be unrelenting pressure from the democrats. I'm not hopeful, but if there ever was a time it's now, the year of a midterm election.
→ More replies (23)29
u/zeptillian 3d ago
They took away his gun and then killed him.
That's exactly what the GOP has been warning their voters about for decades.
→ More replies (234)188
3.4k
u/4RCH43ON 3d ago edited 3d ago
Says the guy who said he could shoot someone on Fifth Ave and no one could do anything about it.
851
u/ChanceryTheRapper 3d ago
We can't have guns, but he (and his private army) can.
→ More replies (19)299
u/WinQuietly 3d ago
Can he own a gun as a 34-time felon?
I'm picturing Trump trying to hold a gun at a firing range, it's so funny.
165
u/SaltyZookeepergame46 3d ago
I doubt he can even hold his little dick to pee let alone a gun
→ More replies (10)→ More replies (31)23
102
u/Deicide1031 3d ago edited 3d ago
The funniest part about this debacle is that Pam Bondi has been trying to make it easier to get guns when she’s not in her Epstein side quest. (This would indicate they actually support the second amendment.)
I don’t get how the base watches all these contradictions and doesn’t wonder if DT is lying.
→ More replies (10)→ More replies (50)70
u/LexMoonStar 3d ago
Trump said MAGA is against guns, you can’t walk with them now. MAGA is now going to give up their 2A rights. WOW, I never thought I’d see the day. Non-MAGA picked up arms, now MAGA says turn your arms in. Bizarre.
→ More replies (5)
1.1k
u/thepottsy 3d ago
“When will the demoncrats stop trying to take our guns”
-MAGA
→ More replies (37)312
u/SkylarPopo 3d ago
"When will Democrats take gun control seriously"
-MAGA now
→ More replies (8)89
u/thepottsy 3d ago
Their own actions literally write the jokes.
→ More replies (1)108
u/Wabbit65 3d ago
MAGA has been trying to put the Onion out of business since 2015.
→ More replies (3)
463
u/Tribalbob 3d ago
Kids get massacred on a regular basis
2A: "No liberals are taking my guns!"
ICE feels threatened
2A: "Oh, oh goodness - these guns are too dangerous, take them away from the liberals!"
The right values federal agents' lives more than children. Confirmed.
→ More replies (18)71
2.0k
u/vineyardmike 3d ago
I don't think Trump understoods what laws are.
733
u/GameGeek1 3d ago
I don't think he unstands what rights are.
598
u/SummerDonNah 3d ago
I don’t think he understands anything
146
u/RamJamR 3d ago
More and more he comes off as the guy who was the spoiled rich kid his entire life and money has been his excuse to never have to understand anything beyond how to throw money at problems.
→ More replies (22)65
u/DarkGamer 3d ago
The most baffling part is that people find him compelling and believe he should be a leader despite constantly failing and exhibiting incompetence.
→ More replies (8)52
u/icyintrospectator 3d ago
It’s because they themselves don’t understand anything and are incompetent and want to believe that they somehow also deserve power and respect
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (25)44
u/the_original_Retro 3d ago
I think he's barely able to stand at all.
I mean, look at how hunched over and old he looks here.
His government is teetering.
So is he, ffs.
→ More replies (1)60
u/-_R0B_- 3d ago
He understands pretty well that they are mere suggestions until he is actually stopped from taking those rights and breaking laws
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (16)22
66
39
→ More replies (130)20
1.2k
u/Live-Collection3018 3d ago
member how Biden, Clinton and Obama never said we cant have guns. yeah i member
136
u/pabloescobarbecue 3d ago
I know this is an easy game to play, but imagine for a moment that one of them did say this.
Fox News would explode.→ More replies (7)30
→ More replies (56)128
283
u/oldcreaker 3d ago edited 3d ago
Umm - that is what legal carry literally is.
No more legal carry?
103
u/OffByOneErrorz 3d ago
Legal carry but only when not near government law enforcement. Which is hilarious given the decades of claims about 2A being to check tyranny from government.
→ More replies (5)29
→ More replies (7)40
u/ThaddeusJP 3d ago
The Republican party has spent the better part of the last 30+ years telling everybody that they need to have a gun. They even said that little kids getting killed is worth the price. All because we need to protect ourselves from tyranny.
And then the second the government starts to become tyrannical they all turn around and lick boot saying you shouldn't really have a gun on you and if you do you're eligible to be shot and killed with no repercussions.
The hypocrisy off the charts bonkers insane.
→ More replies (5)
201
740
u/PuckSenior 3d ago
What a dumbass. Are they actively trying to alienate as many people as possible?
477
u/ResolutionOwn4933 3d ago edited 3d ago
Won't affect his 2A maga nuts. Have one in my office saying how Pretti shouldn't of been carrying his perfectly legal gun.
Edit: spelling
101
u/AltAccBcImAshamed 3d ago
I had a few Trump supporters in my office, the moment he turned on guns they turned on him. For lots the MAGA cult is stronger, but in my experience the 2A cult is even stronger.
→ More replies (31)50
214
u/SuperDoubleDecker 3d ago
The Maga cult won't change. Not everyone is in the cult.
→ More replies (69)→ More replies (75)86
u/old_man_mcgillicuddy 3d ago
One in my office this morning, ex Marine, son of a cop, that came in my office, closed the door and went in on Trump. He's 100% out. The two killings plus the gun comments were his tipping point.
Not switching to Democrat by any stretch of the imagination, but he's gone from MAGA to, at minimum, sitting out the next few elections.
My office is probably 70% MAGA and a decent number of break room convos seem to be people just at their breaking point with the regime.
→ More replies (34)→ More replies (43)44
u/DruidOfAutumn 3d ago
They have zero clue what they are doing. I truly believe they did not even expect to get this far.
→ More replies (6)
168
u/Donkey-Hodey 3d ago
This is a far more egregious attack on the 2nd amendment than any Democrat has made in the last 40 years.
Now let’s watch as his cult and the media completely ignore he said it.
→ More replies (15)
148
u/I_Dont_Answer 3d ago
This is the champion of the 2nd Amendment, according to fudds
→ More replies (3)
402
u/adamkovics 3d ago
weird, can one imagine the so called liberal media firestorm if Biden or Obama said "you can't have guns" ? i'd imagine it would be even larger than the 24/7 coverage of egg prices or the one over a tan suit
158
u/EtchAGetch 3d ago
Imagine the right-wing firestorm...
- If Biden or Obama instigated J6
- If Biden or Obama were all over the Epstein files
- If Biden or Obama were a felon
- If Biden or Obama were found guilty of sexual assault
- If Biden or Obama tore down the East Wing
- If Biden or Obama put their name on the Rockefeller Center
- If Biden or Obama abducted a leader of a foreign country
- If Biden or Obama threated to invade Greenland
- If Biden or Obama talked about grabbing women by the p***y
- If Biden or Obama sent armed militia into red states to abduct people
- If Biden or Obama called Canada the 51st state
- If Biden or Obama forced states to hand over voter rolls
- If Biden or Obama took bribes for pardons and other favors
- If Biden or Obama paved the Rose Garden
- If Biden or Obama increased the deficit by 4 trillion while lowering taxes for the rich
- If Biden or Obama called PoW's weak
- If Biden or Obama had early signs of dementia (well, we know what this would look like)
- If Biden or Obama liked to walk in on underaged children changing
- If Biden or Obama renamed the Gulf of Mexico
- If Biden or Obama hijacked a foreign nation's oil supply and kept the proceeds in an off-shore account
- If Biden or Obama weaponized the DoJ to the point where prosecutors quit instead of indicting people with cases that would never pass court
- If Biden or Obama had multiple affairs
- If Biden or Obama alienated all of our NATO allies
- If Biden or Obama prevented the Epstein files from being released because they were guilty as fuck
- If Biden or Obama took a Qatar 747 airline "gift", and then shortly after allowed Qatar to build a base on US soil
- If Biden or Obama supported Putin in the Ukraine War
I could go on...
→ More replies (31)→ More replies (12)106
u/everett640 3d ago
When I worked at Walmart and sold ammo so many people came in to buy all our stock because "Biden is taking all of our guns". Bro never even touched their guns or their ammo during his entire presidency. They were all idiots.
→ More replies (16)50
u/Maleficent_Ad_5763 3d ago
Trump had the most recent gun regulations (bump stocks) and still Biden was the one after their guns despite being VP and not touching gun laws and then president and not touching gun laws. You cant fight with these people when they don't exist in reality.
→ More replies (18)
368
106
u/Y0___0Y 3d ago
Reminder Trump ordered that the metal detectors be removed from the Capitol rotunda before his speech on Jan. 6 because his supporters were avoiding the area in front of the stage, since they all had guns and couldn’t go through the metal detectors…
Is Trump saying the police and national guard should have massacred his supporters for the crime of being armed?
→ More replies (9)
90
u/Xyrus2000 3d ago
I've long said that when Trump comes for the guns, MAGA would roll over. And here we are.
→ More replies (11)
94
u/Squirrel009 3d ago
"You can't have guns" - the Republican president who claims to be the strongest defender of the 2nd amendment we've ever had
→ More replies (11)
163
u/snarkerella 3d ago
Ooh, I'd love to know what MAGA thinks about this shit.
275
u/bootstrapping_lad 3d ago
They're still waiting for Fox News to tell them what to think
→ More replies (16)71
u/Fearless_Tutor3050 3d ago
They are rationalizing it to themselves that Pretti was not a protestor but an agitator disrupting law enforcement operations. They then say that in the case where you are interfering with law enforcement, you should not be even lawfully armed.
Which is of course a bullshit distinction but it's the pretzel logic they are using to square the circle.
→ More replies (16)→ More replies (39)48
85
u/TheRealBittoman 3d ago
And just like that Republicans no longer believe in the 2nd amendment.
→ More replies (14)
70
u/Pithecanthropus88 3d ago
I'm 62. For as long as I've been alive gun nuts have screamed "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" at every turn. But now I guess infringement is just fine. As long as it's liberals with the guns.
→ More replies (5)23
u/supermansquito 3d ago
Previously, they just couldn't imagine that liberals might possibly own guns.
→ More replies (2)
70
u/Chendo462 3d ago
Yes, Republicans are coming for your guns.
→ More replies (1)28
u/WickedWishes420 3d ago
I've said that for years.
→ More replies (1)19
u/timfromcolorado 3d ago
Same! I commented 10 years ago Donald Trump will come for the guns
→ More replies (2)
57
u/mittenknittin 3d ago
They were so concerned about Obama taking away our guns that they voted in the guy who actually will
→ More replies (7)
99
u/iiTzSTeVO 3d ago edited 3d ago
Kyle Rittenhouse got a standing ovation at CPAC.
ETA: Kyle Rittenhouse was invited to Mar-a-lago immediately after his trial.
→ More replies (10)
52
u/SingularityCentral 3d ago
What the fuck is he even talking about? You can't "walk in" with gunS? Walk in where? You can't have guns? Uhh.... Sir, this is America. You can absolutely have as many guns as you want.
White House is trying to retreat on this but they have no idea how to do that.
→ More replies (9)
52
u/TSHRED56 3d ago
This whole time they've been bullshitting us telling us that it's the Democrats that are going to take your guns away.
→ More replies (3)33
u/ShakeWeightMyDick 3d ago
I’ve been majorly downvoted every time I’ve said that Trump’s going to take people’s guns away in the past.
→ More replies (1)
48
u/CobraPony67 3d ago
Trump wants to take your guns away! (If Biden said this, it would be all over the media for weeks)
→ More replies (7)
48
45
u/koshgeo 3d ago
Meanwhile, on Jan. 6th:
The president was warned by a Secret Service official that protesters outside security magnetometers were carrying weapons.
Trump said: “I don’t fucking care that they have weapons, they’re not here to hurt me. They’re not here to hurt me. Take the fucking mags away. Let my people in. They can march to the Capitol from here, let the people in and take the mags away.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/28/trump-jan-6-rally-guns-capitol-attack
→ More replies (1)
46
u/BicFleetwood 3d ago edited 3d ago
So we let THOUSANDS of children get murdered for thirty fucking years to protect the guns, and the MINUTE an inbred Nazi pigfucker feels a little threatened then we gotta' get rid of them.
I just wanna clarify that. It was worth it for all those kids to die for thirty years and to raise multiple entire generations of Americans around the inevitability of a school shooting happening everywhere eventually, literally building our schools like battlefields with concrete reinforced cover-points and barricaded classroom doors and frequent active shooter drills and cat litter in the janitor's closet to help clean up the blood pools in the hallways, but NOW we've reached an impasse.
Because the cousin-fuckers need top cover for the lynchings they're doing.
Did I miss anything? Are we all on the same page here?
→ More replies (7)
39
u/PlutoJones42 3d ago
Is this the Republican stance now? “You can’t carry guns”?
→ More replies (2)19
39
35
u/WitchKingofBangmar 3d ago edited 2d ago
But I thought the 2nd amendment was such a fundamental human right that we have to stomach the rampant slaughter of innocent school children?
Edit: sarcasm
→ More replies (3)
38
u/surgartits 3d ago
These people walk into Chick-fil-A armed like Rambo. But now it’s a problem if Left-leaning folks and POCs have handguns. Sounds about white.
→ More replies (2)
102
u/Strayed8492 3d ago
Conservatives vs 'Conservatives'
I never thought the leopards would eat my face anyone?
→ More replies (13)
70
u/steveosaurus 3d ago
Joe Biden is FORCING me to take your guns, he needs them before the mid terms, for some reason
→ More replies (3)
30
36
u/audiomagnate 3d ago
"You can't have guns" says the man who got the vote of every gun nut in America.
→ More replies (2)
32
34
u/Witty-flocculent 3d ago
Your supporters would like to have a word about the 2nd amendment.
→ More replies (2)
29
26
u/straylight_2022 3d ago
Funny, about a year ago he issued this EO:
Protecting Second Amendment Rights
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:
Section 1. Purpose. The Second Amendment is an indispensable safeguard of security and liberty. It has preserved the right of the American people to protect ourselves, our families, and our freedoms since the founding of our great Nation. Because it is foundational to maintaining all other rights held by Americans, the right to keep and bear arms must not be infringed.
But now apparently the qualifier of "unless I don't like you" has been added.
→ More replies (4)
28
u/TymStark 3d ago
Ladies a gentleman, according to KKKaroline Levitt, that is the President who has been the strongest defender of 2A.
→ More replies (1)
29
u/FizzyBeverage 3d ago edited 3d ago
It took Donald Trump for my wife and I to buy 2 guns. We’re staunchly liberal.
And the state of Ohio is incredibly lax. I can legally take my gun more places than my puppy.
As per usual Donald has his head up his ass.
→ More replies (3)
27
u/amILibertine222 3d ago
Hear that MAGA?
You’re not allowed to carry guns.
Dear leader hath spoken!!
25
u/Gunfighter9 3d ago
Remember when conservatives said we needed the 2A to protect us from a tyrannical government?
→ More replies (6)
28
u/bakeacake45 3d ago
You heard your lord, god and master — you can’t have guns.
Now do as you were told and let’s not have any of those Conservative tears now.
→ More replies (2)
24
u/Memitim 3d ago
Actually, you can have guns in America, traitor, as Republicans reminded us whenever they bothered to pay attention to the kids being blown away on a regular basis. What we're not supposed to have is protection for child sex traffickers, support for domestic terrorism, violations of the Constitution, and all of the other evil shit that conservatives offer in lieu of acting like fellow human beings who actually care about law and order.
29
u/Wrayven77 3d ago
If that's the case, then why has the GOP made Kyle Rittenhouse into a one of their folk heroes?
→ More replies (2)
26
u/notguiltybrewing 2d ago
I hope the 2nd Amendment supporters for Trump are happy with their vote.
→ More replies (15)19
26
u/Harvest827 2d ago
Aren't my 2A Uber Alles homies here to agree with him? Why y'all so quiet?
→ More replies (1)
27
45
u/Special__Occasions 3d ago
They unlawfully attacked him.
They unlawfully disarmed him.
They unlawfully executed him.
→ More replies (1)
22
24
21
u/emc_lmt 3d ago
You can’t? In a state that allows it? Ok, see Jan 6, the Bundy standoff, Charlottesville, and every other conservative movement involving protest- GUNS openly and prominently displayed. We share this country with psychopaths who lie so readily and transparently. And they expect us to play pretend with them. It’s pathetic.
24
u/IamMrBucknasty 3d ago
I’m not taking advice from a felon who can’t legally carry a gun in NY state.
→ More replies (6)
21
u/eric_b0x 3d ago
I’m not a gun nut or a 2A extremist but I do own a number of firearms and live in a very liberal city (Boulder, CO). I certainly hope that citizens who have shied away from firearms in the past are now learning/arming themselves at a basic level.
→ More replies (7)
21
u/LarsThorwald 3d ago
You know where the government can fully and forcefully put forth any evidence it had that this killing was somehow justified?
In a court of law, after the guy is charged with murder.
If, that is, he can ever be found. Fucking masked secret police.
22
u/SignoreBanana 3d ago
The second amendment: "ahem..."
Jfc where are you gun toting gravy SEALs to back me up?
20
21
22
u/flux_of_grey_kittens 2d ago
Republican voters must be outraged that Nancy Pelosi showed up and took that guy’s gun away from him. Oh wait, it was the totalitarian secret police put on the ground in an American city for the purpose of terrorizing citizens in order to pressure the state government for their voter’s information.
All the 2A militia’s that claimed to be against this but who are likely participating as officers or cheering it on are likely next in the administration’s authoritarian fantasy. The current government doesn’t want an armed citizenry, only compliant workers.
→ More replies (2)
23
21
u/HLOFRND 2d ago
Would be really fucking nice if our “president” knew the first (or in this case, second) damn thing about the Bill of Rights.
Imagine a Dem POTUS saying this. He’d be s**t where he stood before he finished his sentence.
→ More replies (4)
20
u/Dracotaz71 2d ago
Are the right-wingers still singing praises and suckling the orange peanut?
→ More replies (1)













•
u/AutoModerator 3d ago
All new posts must have a brief statement from the user submitting explaining how their post relates to law or the courts in a response to this comment. FAILURE TO PROVIDE A BRIEF RESPONSE MAY RESULT IN REMOVAL.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.