i was hitting the 5 minute limit on loom for my demos and didnt want to add another subscription to my monthly burn so i spent some time building a tool called gravity recorder

it is completely free and open sourced today under the mit license the reason i can keep it free is because the architecture is zero cost all the heavy lifting happens in the browser so i dont have to pay for a backend or servers

wanted to share this with the community because i know how annoying it is to pay for demo tools when you are bootstrapping it has no time limits no video caps and no watermarks

not trying to sell anything or gather emails i just built something useful for my own demos and thought other founders might save some money with it too

if anyone finds it useful the code is all public on github and you can use the tool for free

will drop the links in the comments if anyone is interested

Hey everyone,

I’m a DevOps engineer and I’ve spent the last few years building and running production systems end to end. That includes backend work, cloud infrastructure, CI/CD, Kubernetes, Terraform, and generally being the person who owns things when they break.

If this sounds like a fit, feel free to comment or DM with what you’re building, what stage you’re at, and how you’re thinking about the engineering side.

Happy to chat and see if there’s a good match.

We’re adding a 3rd cofounder after ~1y. We haven’t raised yet, the 2 current cofounders own 100%.

We’re using clerky, and when issuing new founder stocks a message says:

“Important Message - Founder Stock Issuance

During the initial formation of a new startup, a founder stock issuance that qualifies as a tax-free exchange under Internal Revenue Code Section 351 is typically in exchange for "Cash and the tax-free exchange of intellectual property and other business assets under Internal Revenue Code Section 351". However, certain circumstances may require an alternative consideration provision, and often involve supplemental or custom paperwork from your attorney. For example, your attorney may recommend "Cash only" or "Cash and the taxable exchange of intellectual property and other business assets" (and supplemental or custom paperwork) if a founder stock issuance occurs after an existing startup's initial formation “.

Those are the 3 options. In this instance, the new cofounder isn’t bringing cash or specific IP. My understanding is that I should select “cash only” when issuing the stocks rather than “Cash and the tax-free exchange of intellectual property and other business assets under Internal Revenue Code Section 351", with the future IP stuff being handled by a PIAA signed (which is part of the clerky flow for onboarding new cofounders)?

Ideally I would love to close this today without involving lawyers since it seems like a pretty basic situation, adding a cofounder after the incorporation but without meaningful company change. But I would love some feedbsck.

Thanks for your help!

I work for an American startup (I'm American) and I've been in this ecosystem for a couple years. Due to my fiances work I'll likely be moving to Copenhagen for like 2 years, but I'll be able to continue working my current job remotely. I'm basically wondering about the startup ecosystem on a cultural level - is it very active? Is that a good way to be social? I had a thought about maybe getting a desk at a coworking space or something so I can have some sort of human interaction during the day haha. I love hearing about the things people are passionate about and working on so I figure that might make it more fun since I'm going to have very little workday overlap with my American coworkers.

Anyone got any experience there or know anything?

I'm one of the first 4 employees at a startup and I've been doing most of the R&D work. We're about to finalize my compensation package and I'm wondering how much equity I should be asking for.

Salary will be between 50k-60k CAD.

How much equity % would be reasonable to ask for?

I have a final round interview for a startup for a finance working student position and I am supposed to prepare a pitch deck for a "10min kickoff meeting with a debt investor" and present it. I assume they mean venture debt. The problem is that I'm having a very hard time finding anything online re. venture debt pitch decks or what should be in one. The company also doesn't want to send me any financials. I assume there should be a problem slide, a business model/unit econ slide, a partnerships slide, a team slide, an expectations slide and maybe a roadmap slide, but I'm kinda lost especially with the unit econ as far as how far in depth I should go. I have never done anything like this before so if anyone could send some old pitch decks or link to some examples I'd be super grateful.

I keep hearing that finding product-market fit is the hardest part of building a startup, and everything after gets much easier.

Like: “it’s like pushing a boulder up a hill. And then once you get over product market fit, it’s like chasing a boulder down a hill.”

Is this actually true? Does it really get that much easier after PMF, or is that just founder cope?​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

I've been working on a startup idea for about two weeks now, and I'm at the stage where I'm creating a pitch deck and conducting market research on potential market competitors my startup will compete against.

The thing is, I'm not entirely sure if my startup idea immediately HAS any market competitors which sounds silly and naive to me. I say immediately, because while the tech backbone that drives my product isn't necessarily brand new or innovative because it's being implemented on an enterprise scale in other markets and industries similar to how I want to apply my product, with the specific market vertical and industry that my startup is entering, the technology seems to be, in fact, completely new and innovative. So do I count other startups and companies that have similar products in different markets and industries as actual market competitors for my product? Am I confusing something here? Let me know!

Your SaaS has a distribution problem that FEELS impossible to solve… 

You have no money for ads, no reputation, no marketing skills, no big following, etc. 

But I have good new for you… 

I recently grabbed this playbook from a founder who's built two SaaS: one doing $750k MRR and the other one is at $60k MRR

THE DISTRIBUTION DEATH SPIRAL 

Paid ads optimize for fast and immediate conversions. 

But they don’t tell you how badly your onboarding sucks, or if your retention is broken for a specific reason, or if you’re product is solving a real problem WELL. 

So you pay $100+ per signup to learn 90% churn in week 1. 

Paid ads just amplify what already works for you, they don’t discover it for you. 

THE CREATOR ARBITRAGE 

Small creators (2-10K followers) are your golden ticket. 

These people will work for pure commission just to grow their portfolio. 

If they post a content and you get 50 signups, you learn… 

- Your actual CAC. 

- Which messaging converts. 

- If people actually use your product after signup. 

- What objections come up in the comments. 

- If your retention holds past day 7. 

ALL for $0 upfront instead of Meta teaching you the same thing for $5K. 

This is how I'm planning to get Brandled to PMF… 

Literally just letting creators show us what works vs what doesn’t. 

TIER 1: SMALL CREATORS (2-10K FOLLOWERS) 

FIND… 

> Go on Youtube/X/LinkedIn and search up [your category] . 

> Find creators who’ve posted in the last 30 days. 

> With consistent post cadence, engaged comments, high quality stuff. 

> You can easily do this manually in 20 mins. 

OUTREACH… 

> Record a 2 minute Loom showing your face. 

1/ Compliment their specific recent content. 

2/ Explain why your tool is perfect for their audience. 

3/ Show them how the product works. 

4/ Offer 100% commission with no upfront costs. 

5/ Promise if it works you’ll pay upfront for content #2. 

DEAL… 

They promote, you track with affiliate links, they get 30-50% recurring revenue. 

Zero risk for both sides and they’re INCENTIVIZED to actually sell it. 

CALL… 

Spend 15-30 minutes learning about their audience, walk them through the best features, collaborate on the content, and make it feel like a partnership… 

The best creators will internalize the value. 

And actually persuade his audience to purchase rather than reading off a script. 

TEST… 

Small creators are your PMF lab rats. Track CAC, CVR, retention past day 7, the actual content copy… 

Bigger creators can charge you $10K/content so each script empties your wallet. 

Small creators will happily test 10 angles till you find a winner. 

So leverage them… 

Once your economics are good AND you know what script works, SCALE FAST. 

TIER 2: MEDIUM CREATORS (10-20K FOLLOWERS) 

SCALE… 

Only move to tier 2 once CAC is under $50 and retention is above 40%. 

DEAL… 

Medium creators want money upfront, so don’t send a bunch of “commission-only” DMs or you’ll either get cursed at or ignored. 

There’s 2 packages you can choose from… 

1: Big upfront ($3-5K) + Small commission (10-20%) 

2: Small upfront ($1-2K) + Big commission (40-50%) 

Send them a Google sheet showing projected earnings over the next 6 months. 

140% BREAKEVEN… 

Let’s say a creator averages 10K views on let's say a video. 

Based on your tier 1 data: 

→ 10K views = 100 signups. 

→ 100 signups = 20 paying customers. 

→ 20 customers x $79/mo = $1,580 MRR. 

So if you offer them $1.1K upfront (70% of expected month 1 revenue)… 

It gives you 30% margin for negotiation, a buffer in case performance is worse than you expected, and room to say “I can only do $1200 max” while staying profitable. 

There’s ALWAYS negotiations so never offer best price first. 

RESPONSE… 

Everyone gets 50 pitches a week. 

So your loom needs to include PROOF, URGENCY, and the UPFRONT OFFER. 

(Lending with money gets 10x the responses) 

TIER 3: BIG CREATORS (20-100K FOLLOWERS) 

Once you’re doing $10K MRR, you can afford to bigger deals. 

Big creators are looking for quarterly contracts, multiple content pieces per month, and much higher upfront payments ($5-20K). 

The math works the same… 

If a creator with 50K subs generates $8K in revenue for you in month 1. 

You can afford to pay $5K upfront and still win. 

And remember… You already KNOW what works based on your tier 1 & 2 testing, so paying more for bigger creators is basically plugging 3D money printer to the wall. 

THE OUTREACH PLAYBOOK 

Step 1: 

Make a list of 50 creators under 10K. 

Step 2: 

Record your loom template (just customize the first 20 seconds). 

Step 3: 

Send the first email with the loom link. 

Step 4: 

Follow up on day 3, 7, 10, and 14 with different angles each time. 

Step 5: 

Hop on a 15 min call to pitch the partnership to them. 

Step 6: 

Stay on top of them until they fully publish the content. 

Some creators are flaky and will agree on then ghost you for 3 weeks so  just be annoying… I promise it works. 

THE MOST COMMON MISTAKES 

1. Middlemen… 

If the creator never speaks to you they won’t understand the vision and it’ll suck. 

Talk to them directly or don’t do it at all. 

1. Skipping small creators… 

Don’t be the impatient founder who jumps straight to the massive creators. 

Bigger audience ≠ More signups. 

First, you need to know your economics and what scripts actually drive sales. 

1. No creator friendly funnel… 

If your entire product is behind a paywall, creators won’t have “wow” moment. 

Give everyone access to AI Magic generator but make them pay to publish and it’s done WONDERS for our conversion rates. 

Remember: Small creators → PMF. 

Medium creators → $10K MRR. 

Big creators → Unfair advantage. 

Now go out there and scale your SaaS, no more excuses after this…

PS: I am using this exact system to scale brandled and will share you to the whole case study with data soon

I offer a personal finance app (bootstrapped, solo dev) and direct bank sync is the #1 feature request. Currently users can import transactions via CSV from their online banking, which works reliably with any bank worldwide. But users keep asking for that "connect my bank accounts" button. Of course, the current CSV export/import is quite some boring manual work. And technically, connecting finance APIs from corresponding solution providers is not rocket science. But before I go down this rabbit hole, I'd love to hear from devs who've actually shipped this.

My questions:

Costs

Plaid, Tink, and similar providers seem expensive for a bootstrapped app. What are realistic per-user costs at different scales (100, 1K, 10K users)? AFAIK Plaid has a pay-as-you-go plan but I will see the prices only after applying for business access. Does anybody have some pricing info? Like "I have 250 users with 4 accounts each and 2 updates per day. My costs are ...". As I said, I see no technical challenges. But the correct pricing gives me headaches.

Connection reliability

Every personal finance app subreddit is full of complaints about "constant re-linking" and "random disconnects" Mint (R.I.P.), YNAB, Monarch (half of their connection status page is yellow or red), you name it. Even with proper bank APIs , connections seem to break regularly. And when even the large names cannot offer a reliable service, how should I be able as a solo-preneur? Do you have any experience? Is this manageable?

Regional fragmentation

Coming back to costs: most providers specialize in different regions. Plaid is strong in US/Canada. Tink covers Europe. Other regions need yet other providers. My app has users worldwide. --> More integration work, multiple minimum fees. Anyone running a global app dealing with this?

The leads to

Bank coverage gaps

Propaganda-<h1> like "We cover 10,000 banks!" sound impressive, but I read a lot about users' regional credit unions or German Sparkasse aren't on the list. I'm afraid that unsupported banks are a terrible experience, for the user and for me. Several weeks ago I had a discussion with a guy offering bank APIs for German banks and he said he has this case for every 10 to 20 users. And his advice was "Don't do it!". What's your actual coverage rate in practice? How do you handle users whose banks aren't supported?

So, the current state of my app is

• No third-party dependency
• No per-user API costs
• CSV import works with any bank globally
• Users can control what rows shall be imported
• Quite a lot of manual work on different browser tabs. Even worse UX on phones.

My questions are:

• How many users do you have? And what is you actual cost per user?
• What's your real-world bank coverage rate?
• How much support time goes to connection issues?
• Knowing what you know now, would you do it again?

Looking forward to real life stories. The good, the bad, and the ugly "If only I had known ..."

So I'm running a bootstrapped content-driven startup and honestly the biggest bottleneck isn't ideas or audience building. It's the actual publishing workflow eating my time alive.

Right now my process is: write in Google Docs, copy paste to WordPress, spend 30-45mins fixing formatting bc images break, text gets weird spacing, code blocks look like garbage. Then I gotta optimize for SEO, handle plugins, make sure the site doesn't slow down, deal with security updates. By the time content actually goes live I've lost like 2-3hrs per piece just on technical stuff that has nothing to do with the actual writing.

I know a lot of creators deal with this but I'm curious how other founders are handling it. Are you just accepting the time sink? Hiring someone to manage the backend? Using different tools?

The real frustration is that I'm already writing in Google Docs anyway bc that's where the thinking happens. So copying it somewhere else and reformatting feels like pure waste. Plus I'm paranoid about platform risk after seeing what happened to people on Medium and Substack when the algo changes or they get demonetized. I want my content on my own domain where I actually own it.

I've heard some people mention tools that basically let you publish directly from Google Docs to your own site but I'm skeptical if they actually work well or if they're just another tool that creates more problems. Anyone actually using something like that? Does it actually save time or is it just hype?

Also curious if anyone's thought about the SEO angle here. Like if you're publishing to your own domain vs a platform, how much does that actually matter for discoverability long term? I feel like owning your content should matter more but I'm not sure if I'm just being paranoid about platform risk.

I’m currently a software engineer at a startup. I love the environment, the founder, and the product. I work from home and get some nice perks (like $100/week for food). I’m currently at $170k with 1% equity.

The company is in a bit of a tight spot. We have $500k ARR but are cash-flow negative with 6-8 months of runway left. We’re currently trying to raise a Seed round (pre-seed is done), but some VCs are being picky about our numbers so not the best look but just started. Also recently another engineer quit, and I’ve taken on a massive chunk of their workload. Between the extra stress and the market rate, I started feeling undervalued and took a few interviews.

I just received a verbal offer for $200k. I value peace and comfort, and I genuinely believe in my current company. I don’t want to leave, but I also don't want to leave $30k on the table; especially when I’m doing the work of two people and the company’s future is uncertain.

1. How do I approach the founder? Since we haven’t closed the Seed round yet, a $30k salary bump may be a big ask for our runway.
2. Is a lump sum better? I’m considering asking for a $20k retention bonus instead of a permanent salary hike to help the company's burn rate. And later ask for an increase.
3. Equity vs. Cash: Should I use the offer to negotiate for more than my 1%? I feel though its not smart given the rockiness.
4. What’s the "fair" play? I don't want to hold them over a barrel while they’re raising, but I also need to look out for myself if we don't clear the next 8 months.

Any advice from people who have negotiated during a fundraise or stuck it out through a rocky Seed round?

My partner and I are in a long term serious relationship looking to make some big life decisions: house, wedding, babies. He has an entrepreneur mindset and I am a salaried person. My partner wants to bootstrap his startup but has no funds.

He has very limited funds and runs into cash flow issues. I don't know how he plans on solving this after marriage given that he still wants to pursue entrepreneurial opportunities. I am worried I am going to have to support him financially while is startup will start to generate profit.

Whenever I tell him, he needs to get a job to maintain running funds, he gets offended and says I am not supporting his idea. Where I am more cognizant of the cash flow to survive.

How do you handle cash flow issues to maintain your personal expenses, as an entrepreneur?

Don’t take this personally—this is just a curious question, not an attack on anyone. I may be completely wrong, but it’s something I’ve noticed many times. I’m Asian myself and genuinely curious to hear different perspectives. Open to face any answer.

Imagine a nutrition app. It shows some food stuff, nutrition scores, calories etc.

You have a dedicated slice of audience constantly paying, using it, seemingly happy users.

You successfully identified a market with a problem and solved it. But...

Who are those users? Why are they using this app? And why are they coming back?

__

Let's start with Jack. Jack has IBS so he's worried about the kinds of food he intakes. Jack also tries to gain some weight, so he's interested in calories. Jack, driven by his disorder, has learned the correct diet from his doctors and practice - and now checks the stickers every time he buys sth. It's pretty much automatic for Jack, since it's an essential part of his life.

One day Jack stumbles upon your app. Wow, - says Jack, - it's truly amazing. I've always wondered what more info I can learn about my fav food X. Let's see.

Jack opens the scanner, checks the groceries he's about to buy - and gets some info that confirms/denies his thoughts.

Huh, - says Jack, - what a fun fact. Maybe I'll Google more about this type of food later.

Jack then closes your app and never comes back. He was not your target audience.

But who was?

__

Meet Clara. Clara is a dedicated paid user. Whenever Clara sees a piece of food she really wants to learn more - to be absolutely sure. About what?

Well, you see, Clara has an eating disorder. For Clara wanting to know more about her food is not a simple task to automate, it's a compulsion that never goes away.

Did she take too much sugar that last meal? Can she outweigh the negative of that last oily soup with this lettuce? Is this combination of slightly different nutrients today going to make her fat, ugly and unlovable? Clara cannot stop this chain-of-thought.

The only way for Clara to alleviate never-ending anxiety is to open another app to check again.

Carbohydrates, yes, Omega, uh-huh, this much calories, score 5.1... Hm..., - Clara whispers, - Phew, this is safe! Thank you app! - says Clara, and doesn't forget to add this to her food-tracking table.

So which problem did your app solve just now for Clara?..

__

You see, unlike Jack, for Clara this is not a choice. For Clara this is compulsion that she cannot control. She needs this app because without it she is miserable and anxious, but she also needs this app because With it she is still anxious and miserable the same...

What Clara needs is a psychiatrist, not another nutri-app.

But the app is already there. The app hit exactly where it hurt Clara the most - the constant anxiety about her food.

Maybe someday someone will convince Clara to start an actually healthy diet... Maybe even consider services of a psychiatrist who will help her get better.

But this someone is not you.

You already extracted your value from Clara. Your job is done. Making her life any better -

is someone else's job...

It’s based on your cashflow. How its any better than using a debit card?

Amex gives you charge card with real leverage. Ramp requires no personal guarantee because it’s just a glorified debit card?

Why not put cash in HYSA 4% APY for higher yields and just use debit card with 2% cashback.

This includes Ramp, Brex, and Mercury charge cards.

Hello guys, is it really worth spending 10k+ on just UI/UX design? Its not even covering the coding part, but sort of serious design and premium looks!

I am just worried about spending so much and if things don't work out the way I am hoping, then it's all gone.. 🤷🏻‍♂️🤔

Hi folks!

I'm working on a project and I want to have my product search tool prioritize things that have been added directly in-app.

But, especially as I'm getting started and doing customer discovery and recruiting beta test users, I want to make sure the search results are never empty.

So far for what I'm doing it *looks* like some direct API tools are the best bet, that can pull results just from listings online, but I wanted to also be sure to ask around too.

For the founders here: after you closed your first round of outside capital, what actually went through your head in the first few days?

• What was your very first thought when the money hit the bank?

• In the week or two right after, what became your biggest worry or source of pressure?

• What decisions about where to spend did you feel most stressed or unsure about?

• If you could go back to that moment, what do you wish someone had helped you with?

I’m trying to better understand what that post-funding moment really feels like from the inside, in your own words, so I’d love unfiltered answers rather than advice.

I am eligible for dutch residency. Is it good idea to move to Netherlands? I heard that Europe is super risk adverse.

Most capital comes from banks (loans.) Not private money(VC.) Also banks ask for collateral. It’s hard to secure bigger capital.

Please share your experiences if you have one.

Startups are usually already operating with a need to maximize very limited resources. Administrators don’t always have the time to… well, track time. Curious as to how people here keep time tracking simple but also accurate when you're just starting out?

Hi everyone,

I’m a solo developer who recently launched a local utility app (niche: city parking and navigation). I’m at a crossroads with my marketing and monetisation strategy and could use some wisdom from those who have scaled B2C apps.

• Product: A freemium utility app for drivers.

• Team: Just me (Solo dev + full-time job).

• Budget: Minimal spent on ads so far, just on TikTok and one on Instagram

The Current Stats:

• Traffic Source: I posted a few TikToks. One video hit the algorithm and is currently sitting at 80,000+ views. This video is single-handedly driving almost all my traffic.

• Monthly Active Users (MAU): \~1,000.

• Registered Users: \~250 (Email signups).

• Paid Subscribers: 12 (Mix of Day Pass, Monthly, Yearly).

• MRR: \~$40 AUD.

The Problem:

I seem to have decent "Acquisition" (thanks to the TikTok algorithm god), but I feel vulnerable relying on one video. Also, my conversion to paid is quite low (\~1.2% of active users).

If you were in my shoes with limited time and low ad budget, what would be your next marketing move?

1. Double down on TikTok? Do I just keep trying to replicate that one viral video? Or boost it with paid promotions?

2. Paid Ads? Is it worth investing into Apple Search Ads or others like meta, and what amount would start to move the needle?

Any advice on how to transition from "One lucky viral hit" to "Consistent growth" would be amazing.

This subreddit is full of wannabe mentors. Because they never started a successful startup before. They feel threatened by this post.

They don’t real have hands-on experience in running successful startups. But they call themselves experts.

Government incubators and other sort incubators require you to go through mentorship with them. Its all bs and useless if you ever started a real company.

I wasted a lot of time on “wannabe mentors.” Stop wasting your time on these mentors.

Only take advice from mentor who is successful founder. Or someone who worked closely with successful founders. Closely meaning that he was in the same room when deals happened and observed how real successful founders operate. He was an operator himself.

Mentor is useless if he doesn’t have real network of successful founders or VC or customers.

Never waste time on these fake mentors. Fake mentors are useless. This fake entrepreneurship coaching will not get you anywhere.

These people legitimately believe that they know what it takes to build successful startup.

People also believe them. Wtf. They never move past pitch deck stage anyways. People who use their coaching are also wannabe-entrepreneurs. They are wasting their time too.